Home > Blogosphere > The Illogical ‘Go Green’ Movement

The Illogical ‘Go Green’ Movement

Well before I get to the actual topic of this blog, here’s an update of the news: Iran, nuclear program, terrorists, Israel, Ahmadinejad, wipe off the map, good vs. evil, Hilary Clinton, Obama, Netanyahu…. Syria, rebels, chaos, death, Sanctions, Obama, Warning, Assad, Russia, China, UN, Chemical weapons, Alepo, Al Qaeda, Zionists, Libya, Pakistan, murder, murder, drone-drone, murder, murder, drone, drone… Attack Iran, before US elections? Nuclear warfare! nuclear warfare! Economic crises, economic collapse, Controlled demolition… Inflation, massacre, epidemic, unemployment… Hurricane Isaac, US election, Romney, Romney, Romney, Obama! Romney! Obama! Democrat! Republican! WW3! WW3! Celebrity distraction! Celebrity distraction! Mass-hypnosis, television, drought, drought, flood, flood, drought, drought, fire, fire, flood, hurricane, twister, higher food prices, gas prices, bullshit science, bullshit science, commercial, commercial, commercial, commercial, fear, fear, fear, consume, obey, work your life away..

Sorry to write in sentence fragments, but I get the feeling I’m saying the same shit over and over again. Aside from the subtle differences here and there its the same bullshit in the news, and I think all the sentence fragments of the last paragraph will tell the story just as well as any actual sentence structured paragraph. I didn’t include local news for obvious reasons and some sentence fragments I mentions without getting too specific, things like commercials, celebrity distraction, and bullshit science. Speaking of bullshit science I noticed this bullshit on niacin. Niacin is vitamin B3 and up until this recent trial it was known to reduce the risks of strokes& heart attacks- plus there are many other benefits of taking niacin as well, but that’s not relevant to where I’m going with this. Apparently they had a trial and concluded, “Niacin Does Not Reduce Stroke Or Heart Attack Risk, Trial Ended 18 Months Early”, other headlines indicated that it actually increases the risk of stroke and heart attack which I don’t buy. First of all why would they end the trial 18 months early? There’s a reason these trials are made to go on as long as they do- to get a better analysis of the effects on a group of people over an extended period of time. Also what they don’t mention in the headline of any articles when you google “niacin stroke” is that in these clinical trials they used time release niacin (niacinimide) and also included a prescription drug that is used for high cholesterol and to reduce the risk of strokes, and heart attacks- statin which is basically a pharma counter part of niacin. What people don’t know is that statin has been known to cause strokes. So this is the bullshit science that goes on regularly that I’m talking about. This is like doing a clinical trial for a cure for aids, and ending it early and saying the cure increases the risk of aids in the heading, yet leaving out the fact that the people given the cure also had to have sex with a hoe with aids afterward, and that the cure was a time release version. It’s bullshit science like this that has the masses changing their lifestyles every 2 weeks based on a reporter reading what they’re told to read- while coming off as an official and most of the time it’s not in the people’s best interest- but the interest of bigPharmas quarterly statement, and the population control agenda.

Now let me ask you this, is a birds nest natural? How about a bee hive? A beaver dam? An aunt hill? If you agree that they all are- then why is something that humans make considered unnatural? Everything animals make is considered natural, so if we’re part of nature (assuming we weren’t genetically modified by an advanced species) then everything we make would be natural to then, right? Just saying everyone says that’s not natural! It’s not good for you, it’s unnatural! Natural shit can also be bad for you too. Ever try eating dog shit? Anywho everything is natural if we accept ourselves as part of nature- we just have more complexity and the things we make are advancing exponentially. So let’s grant the notion that everything we make as a species is natural as true- then if we made a robot that made things would that be natural? How about a robot, that makes a robot, that makes things? I’m just wondering what is the criteria which defines something as ‘natural’ or ‘artificial’? Been thinking about this lately and couldn’t explain it with 140 characters on twitter so I put it as paragraph in a blog despite the fact that it’s probably a we bit off-topic.

Now to point out the bullshit in the “go green” meme which irritates me on a regular basis. Now I personally don’t believe that the average human is responsible for global warming. I do think the climate is in a constant flux- but if anything I think this is part of a long regular cycle that our sun goes through which changes the climate in the entire solar system. That or maybe the ionospheric heaters like haarp are impacting the natural (there’s that word again) balance of the weather? But here’s the bullshit- why is it called “going green”. For those of you that have been living in a cave for the past 10 years and don’t know the big man-made global warming THEORY, it proposes that co2 (carbon monoxide) is causing global warming so we have to reduce co2 emissions or else we won’t be able to live on this planet any more. Here’s what I don’t get, co2 is what plants breathe- so if we’re reducing the gas that plants breathe, where does the green come in? You’d assume “go green” would be about some tree-hugging self-important ‘save the planet’ ideology where green is supposed to symbolize plant-life specifically because the chlorophyll in plants which makes them green. So if we’re reducing co2, wouldn’t that be detrimental to plant life? What really pisses me off is the fact that this “go green” bullshit never mentions legalizing weed. This whole green movement is nothing but an insidious method of taking away more freedoms, imposing more taxation, implementing population control, and doing it under the guise of saving the environment. If this was really about saving the environment they would also include the environmental implications of depleted uranium- but that’s the thing. Everything covered in the news is always to build a case for us (the working class) to eventually change our way of living- while never criticizing the corporations that our responsible for far greater damage, or the inefficacy of our bought and sold elections, and any bullshit military endeavor which is leading to the economic implosion of the modern day Roman empire the US- covering that on the corporate news may result in you losing your job as a reporter.

Well the economy is going down, and if you examine the pattern of the last 2 great economic depressions, they were usually followed by great wars (great is a strange word to describe an economic depression or war)- and also potential epidemics. The best way to fix this turmoil is to have a bunch of men kill each other, thus reducing the population dramatically so that we don’t ever have to fix the root of the problems- and the corporations and bankers can continue their crazy ambitions of a new world order- and I call them crazy because I can’t see the appeal in that much power personally, and I can’t imagine any body with the right mind who could. War is fighting strangers from countries you’ve never been to, for bullshit reasons, or because of an ultimatum given by the government of fighting or being imprisoned. I’m not criticizing the troops, because they truly believe what they are doing is the right thing. The majority of the western people are believing in a false terrorist threat because of the 9/11 attack of mass deception which has it’s 11th anniversary coming up. The system has been made to fail, the enemy isn’t in Iran or Syria, and there won’t be any clear way out of this unless people have a mass awakening and see the anomalies of the WTC attacks- so that they can accept that they’re being lied to. It is only then that we can refuse to comply with the military industrial complex collectively. The loss of life in WW1 and 2 could’ve been avoided if the people chose not to fight… If on Christmas they can effectively have a cease fire during WW1 for a day it proves that this behavior is not an impossibility.. so why do we fight at all? “All war is based on deception”, if we can see past the veil of deception maybe there will be peace- research 911!

End Log

Advertisements
Categories: Blogosphere
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: